Archive for category Politics and Current Affairs

Johann Lamont’s speech quotes…how daft does she think we are?

BBC Scotland, in their current inimitable style of seemingly highlighting any No campaigners statements or accusations, presented a selection of Johann Lamont’s speech quotes on their website. Here they are below, with my own comments.

“Let us define ourselves by what we are for, not what we are against.”
Yes, let’s do so. The Yes campaign in the Independence ‘debate’ has a positive message of believing in Scotland’s people. Johann and her pals’ No campaign is merely anti-SNP and has no message but one of fear. What she doesn’t yet quite understand is that things have moved on and people can see its not about the SNP, it’s about the future of Scotland. Can she HONESTLY define herself as being for Scotland’s best interests? Or just against the SNP?

“Scotland can stand united against the Tory cuts and I call upon the SNP to work with us.”
The audacity in this statement is worthy of the sainted Margaret herself! The truth is its the Labour Party under her direction that either sides with the Tories or abstains when there is a vote to stand against the Tory cuts!
The reason Labour don’t stand united against Tory cuts, like welfare cuts and Bedroom Tax is only because they’d have to agree with ‘THEM’ (the SNP). This has become the only thing that Labour stands for – it is anti-SNP rather than holding any socialist principles.

“Our greatest resource will always be our people and if we are to give people the chance to fulfil their potential it is a second education boom we need in Scotland.”
So why then Johanna have you said there should be an end to the “something for nothing culture”? Opposed to the free higher education rights introduced by…the SNP!?

“I am well aware that you don’t appease lions by throwing more Christians at them. And I will not walk an inch down the road to independence.”
That’s a shame because more and more of your party and Labour voters are starting to question why this is. Why would Labour stand rock-solid with an unelected, hated government of millionaire out-of-touch Etonians rather than stand up for traditional Labour values? Is she ashamed of our great country and its people? Does she think we are too wee, too poor and too stupid to look after our own interests? She is living in the past.

“Can I tell you today what powers I really want? They are the powers Alex Salmond already has. The power over Scotland’s education. The power over Scotland’s health service.”
And yet, she has denounced the positive reforms offering free services at point of need as “something for nothing culture”!!! Would she then overturn these reforms if she had the power? This is supposed to be a Labour leader! For shame.

“Is Alex Salmond concerned about the families who pay more for childcare than they do a mortgage?”
I have no idea the answer to this, but based on what I see of party policies and what the SNP government in Holyrood has done compared to the careless arrogance of New Labour / LibDem years, I know who I would trust more.

“I challenge Alex Salmond to meet me next week and to bring his budget.”
Yawn. More Salmond-fishing. Empty rhetoric.

“There is no greater cause than child poverty – its existence diminishes us all.”
Then why did your party abstain on the vital Bedroom Tax vote?

“Alex Salmond is no friend of the poor.”
How many times! Does she think slinging enough mud will make it stick? Again, the only form of ‘argument’ is invective against Salmond and the SNP.
You see, these accusations, the negative campaigning, is designed to paint anyone who challenges this rubbish as a Salmond-apologist. Like a dreaded “Nat”. Nevertheless, it’s worth pointing out that the Scottish Government has introduced free higher education which was and still is opposed by her and her Tory-Labour party.

“We in this party, this movement, will fight for this country we love.”
Only insomuch as Ed lets you! If you cared about Scotland Johann, as much as you cared about protecting your own position, you would vote for what’s best for the country.
Yes, you have no argument to put forward, no policies. All you do in effect is shout “It’s no fair, THEY are more left wing than us! And Ed wont let me do anything!”
What is this movement that you speak of? Are you seriously suggesting that you represent the traditional values of the Labour movement? Or is it a market-driven New Labour (i.e. Tory, anti-Labour) movement you’re talking about?
And what is this country you love? The UK?

In summary….
Johann, you are floundering around, trying to come up with some policy of additional powers for Scotland that your Westminster bosses will see as meaningless enough to let you put forward.
That’s why you floated the idea of promising to allow Holyrood to set the important level of…..airport flight taxes! It is so sad it is beyond humorous.

If that is your idea of Scotland, of the limits you would set on this great country, then I hope your party wakes up to you very soon and forces you out of office.

Your speech was beyond parody. E.g. I hear you have also set up an Orwellian sounding “Truth Team”! Need I point out the irony of this? None of your scare stories have yet stood up to scrutiny and you are even defending Ian Taylor’s donation to Better Together! A trifle disingenuous wouldn’t you say? Maybe the “Truth Team” could help you unpick the deceit surrounding this.

We could really do with some honest debate in the Independence Referendum. But to debate you need to have a credible alternative view. You are bereft – and you’re leading a once-great party, that used to stand up for the real people of the country, to the dogs.

Have a long, hard HONEST and TRUTHFUL look at yourself, Johann.
Stop the dishonest carping and try to come up with real policies. You might need to become a little more shall I say, ‘independent’ to do so.

Labour used to stand up against the Tory policies that decimated the country from Westminster. Now only the ‘dreaded’ SNP government does that, while you have aligned your party with those hated policies. Let me say that I consider the current Scottish Labour party’s direction to not only be contrary to the best interests of our country (by that I mean Scotland), but a gross betrayal of traditional Labour values and all those who have voted Labour in the past.

Be brave Johann. Do you have Labour at heart, or only self-interest? If its the former, you may in all honesty decide to choose your friends a little more carefully.

Double-speak from the Bitter Together campaign

Lies lies and double-speak. We are better independent.

Vote YES in the referendum and we won’t have to listen to the career politicians who care about lining their own pockets and not about our country.

We can have a fair society, with the health service we want, not the Tory (ie English Labour) imposed cuts.

We won’t have to send our young people to fight illegal wars.

We will determine our own way in the world, with our unique voice among nations, instead of being represented by Eton boys.

We will be able to elect the governments we want instead of “appealing to middle England” and ending up ruled by the economic needs of the City of London.

We will be an equal partner in Britain, no longer a northern region of England.

And we will have a media and broadcasting service no longer staffed by fearful hangers-on, who won’t be afraid to speak the Truth instead of spinning every story for their unionist political pals.

The alternative that ‘better together’ would have is be the only country in the world that would be so stupid as to vote against their own right to self-determination. To continue giving away our enviable wealth in oil to an arrogant succession of governments that will squander it on wars and economic disasters.

How would it be to wake up after a no vote and to be the laughing stock of the world? What kind of country would we be to vote no? A non-existent one.

Compare to Norway which has squirrelled away an oil fund of £400 billion. Yet Scotland (a richer country, less oil-dependant) faces a years of austerity and deficit within the UK. While the rich who stole our wealth instead of being jailed, get richer and get more bonuses!

Don’t be fooled any longer. The oil will be there for at least another two generations, that’s why there is increasing private investment.

The UK isn’t fair and isn’t working.

We can bring change to our country. YES we can.

Digiderata

Digiderata

Go cautiously amid the online world, yet always remember what joy there may be in connecting.

-
Be alert to phishing and scams. Do not always use your true personal information. Be wary of signing up to many sites, it is a weariness of the inbox. Retain your right to privacy and exercise it.
Share with those you wish, but do not share too much. Above all, never post images of yourself or others in unguarded or intimate moments. Do not even create such images, or allow them to be taken, however relaxed you may be: those you consider your close friends may yet be too weak to resist the temptation to divulge. Obtain consent.
-
Treat all netizens as you would wish to be treated. Consider how you would feel if malicious posts were made about you. Do not troll or flame, nor indulge in rumours or gossip. There is enough to laugh at without being mean. Be wary of virals.
Allow other people a forum. Even weirdos and technophobes have their views. However, question everything, take nothing at face value. Make friends online but do not trust anyone or any site or app just because they appear alright. You will always meet fakes and con artists. Learn a bit about how the technology works. Use tools that will protect you and and your data; they are often free.
Do not hack or steal someone’s work, however much fun that may be. Other people, even companies, have their rights: though you may not agree with their methods, there are other ways to protest. Yet bear in mind that the powerful often abuse their position. Campaign for the causes you wish; you have a right to speak up.
Try to produce content, not just consume. Anyone can contribute to their local or global culture. Learn. It has never in the history of humankind been easier to learn about everything, as it is now. Teach what you know, reaching out beyond your everyday circles. Praise the efforts of others.
The digital world is here for you to enjoy however you may choose: do not let anyone tell you otherwise, but exercise caution and self-discipline. You will make mistakes; and you may access things of which you will be ashamed. Be gentle with yourself as with others. Forgive yourself and move on.
-
Don’t lose heart in the dark side of the web. Although it may not always appear so, no doubt our tech culture is unfolding as it should and a great age of connectivity is upon us. As in the real world, that which we feed, will grow. Therefore be a positive force.
-
You are a child of the times and you have a right to be here: more so than the government and corporations and banks. Do not surrender your privacy and freedom to those who would deny them. It is your Internet, not theirs.
-
For all its dangers and downtime, its phoneys and filth, it is still a beautiful net.
-
Be careful. Strive to LOL.
———-
-
- Roy Hair, 2012
Creative Commons Licence Digiderata by Roy Hair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Based on a work at http://royhair.com/digiderata. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://royhair.com/digiderata.
-
Original Desiderata by Max Ehrmann available here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desiderata

The UNISON approach to public service reform

A politically charged, but interesting read.

http://clients.squareeye.com/uploads/compass/documents/PublicServiceReformWainwright.pdf

Tags: , , ,

Pub or coffee? Video: Dan Snow explains AV | Yes to fairer votes – Yes to AV – Alternative Vote

Why you should vote YES to AV on Thursday: http://www.yestofairervotes.org/pages/AV-common-sense-solution?utm_medium=email&utm_source=yes&utm_campaign=20110503DanSnow&source=20110503DanSnowEmail

Tags: , , , ,

Snippet from a Robert Anton Wilson interview

This is just a snippet from a RAW interview I was reading that you can find here. I shall introduce the quote with my feeble attempt at a RAW-like extended sentence…!

This extract is just a throwaway deviation from the rest of the interview, which in itself – and in common with all RAW works – deviates all over the place and hasn’t one central theme, but the ideas expressed in this snippet have a singular currency in the financial climate we now find ourselves in and speak of a great truth that is known to us all, but has become hidden behind the cares of the world of which he speaks so pointedly:

MQ: For myself, just to clarify what Fuller spoke of in terms of utilizing natural resources, Fuller said both Marxism and Capitalism was based on the theory of economics put forth by Malthus. How does Fuller get beyond that viewpoint of economics?

Wilson: Well it’s very simple. Malthus assumed — he was an employee of the British East India Company — he observed that population was increasing faster than known resources. So he assumed that there would be perpetual warfare over the resources, and most of the population would perish by starvation or other means, because they weren’t smart enough or cunning enough or ruthless enough to get their share or more than their share. Then Fuller pointed out that resources do not exist apart from us. Resources exist when the human mind sees how to use something. Resources accepted by statisticians and the economists have increased steadily since the time of Malthus. Resources are increasing faster than population actually. This fact is hidden from us by the goddamn banking system, which has inserted a bookkeeping system into the process, whereby every exchange has a interest   charge on it, whether you know it or not. And most of the profits are going to the banks, where as they should be going to the whole population at large, because the credit is not created by the banks, it is created by everybody who’s working.

Even me — even people who are just working at putting words on paper are creating value. And banks aren’t creating a damn thing. They’re just charging usury at  every step of the way.

Full interview in the Maybe Quarterly

Tags: , , , ,

The structural deficit is not as bad as you might think…

We’ve heard the UKUncut movement and others  making claims about the deficit not being as bad as we’ve experienced in the past, particularly the post WWII years; and how Britain effectively spent it’s way out of it then, but here is an article explaining that we’ve never had it so… well, so-so!

Are we being collectively conned out of our wealth and jobs and pensions?

http://m.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/mar/02/unsaid-on-debt-and-deficit?cat=politics&type=article

The Guardian, Wed 2 Mar 2011 00.05 GMT

George Osborne dissimulates. He knows that Ed Balls is at odds with Labour party policy on cuts, knowing that we have 12 to 13 years to pay off debt and deficit. But he also knows that our level of debt (less than 60% of GDP net of bank assets) is within Maastricht Treaty limits (60%) and lower than almost all OECD countries; that this debt is low by historical standards (we sustained debt at more than 100% of GDP for 20 years up until the early 1970s); that debt repayments (less than 3% of GDP) are lower than they were under Thatcher (5.15%) and Major (3.8%); that our deficit is partly created by a low overall tax-take (around 36% compared with the EU average of 40%). He knows this because these are official statistics (available on Google – mostly Office for National Statistics but also ukpublicspending.co.uk).

Tags: , ,